Film broadcasting, music, TV is more expensive and uneven than ever

I recently opened Netflix and was encouraged to watch an episode of “Saturday Night Live”. When I clicked, I was told that I would not actually be chorded for cold Open-because I pay Netflix the smallest amount of money for its advertising level, the show was not available to me. I could update, though, paying an additional $ 10 or more endlessly for an advertising plan that would come with better quality videos, the ability to add my account to more devices, and the privilege of watching a show that has been broadcasting on basic cables for 50 years.

Increasingly, Contents of transmission subject to the levels and tendency of “premiumization”. For years, companies like Netflix, Max, and Disney+ fought so -called Broadcasts – loss of money due to costly content, harsh competition and High rates Among users who left the platform on the platform. But 2024 was the year things came back. Spotify, Netflix and Disney+ were all posting profits, finally making investors happy.

To keep investors happy, the reconciliations that appear as second thoughts in your credit card statement are still increasing. Premiumization has long been a propulsion of levels of levels in the physical world – from plane to airport halls to Disney World – and now digital transmitters are utilizing its power. Price increases are working because they have got us obsessed: most people who leaving Netflix Come back, seduced by a new caste in “Love is blind” or any other original viral premiere. Netflix’s prices increased again in January, Spotify It is reported to be considering a new plan that will give users who pay more premium content, and Amazon music has increased price and more exclusive content in works, too. Equal YouTube TV It grew by $ 10 a month last year, reaching a total of $ 82.99.

While broadcasting finally matures, our wallets may be the last losers of streaming wars.

Almost every service you try to buy today will provide additions. Even discount gyms like fitness plans offer level plans. What is different about these streaming companies is that they were born in an era where they promised us more for less – you can hear the entire Spotify Library instead of buying each song or album, and say goodbye to the Viruses hidden in LimeWire downloads. In 2012, Spotify Daniel Ek said that he sought to create something “better than piracy”, and that the company wanted to “bring music to every single person and bring it at any moment of their lives”. Netflix gave us not only ways to immerse DVDs and snail mail, but access to its hit content everywhere, at any time, without any annoying advertisement (Farewell Forever, Geico Caveman). They recreated the way we watched TV and heard music – the broadcast was so free and flexible that it could easily connect millennia.

This is when the streaming wars rose diligently. Companies tried to swallow existing shows and new talent for their content. The prices were low, and it felt like Cinephiles and Buffs TV had more control and choice than ever. Streamers advertised themselves as if they cared if we, the observers, would have a good time. In a 2020 phone call, the former -ceo of Netflix, Reed Hastings said: “We want to be safe vacation where you can explore, you can be stimulated, have fun and enjoy – and have none of the controversy about using advertising users.” Now, that secure shelter is offered only to those who ask for more money, after Hastings ate his words and launched a cheaper staircase supported by Netflix in 2022. When I was blocked by SNL watching, the Netflix app blamed the licensing agreements, which make a small part of the contents it offers. Since 2023, Pallua no longer offers Free, advertising -based It started with, and now loads $ 7.99 a month for his cheapest plan. Max announced in February that it would remove the entrance to Bleacher Report and CNN Max from its basic level.

“This idea of ​​the good things that cost a little more is not exactly new,” says Max Signorelli, leadership of customer research for media and entertainment at the OMDIA consulting firm. “But of course, long passed are the periods when these relatively new bids were being marketed themselves as free alternatives, applicable to traditional media resources.”

Today, transmitters are not cable alternatives; They are the main flow. The combination of reconciliation and advertising revenue was the model that made companies like Verizon and Comcast Cable Giants. “Many of the newest media companies came out of the gate with a first -degree technological mentality, we will worry about profits and earlier income,” Nii Addy, leading marketing official at Streaming Philo, tells me. “We are at that point of inflation where they have to turn that degree in profits.” Ironically, they are following the traces of the companies they sought to ruin. “Many of these new media companies are with one hand killing inheritance money cows, but then they are also feeding them, and this is based on the same model,” Addy says.

What is good for level prices is that they give you the choice. It’s not as if you force you to be in the business class.
Mr. John Zhang, a marketing professor at Wharton

Netflix had an extraordinary 2024, making $ 39 billion, a 16% increase from 2023. It celebrated the news and at the same time announced a price increase: “We continue to invest in programming and offer more value to our members, occasionally we will ask our members to pay a little more, so that we can re-invest more,” Company in January Profit letter. Warner Bros. Discovery, which includes Max, saw his broadcasting business made $ 677 million in profit in 2024, from $ 103 million a year ago. peacock Revenue increased by 46% from 2023 to 2024, coming to $ 4.9 billion, though it has not yet posted a profit. Paramount+ He says he is on the right track to achieve the full year’s benefit in 2025.

Music flows have stalled even longer, trying to ruin an industry that was extremely profitable before Napster and Limewire destroy it. Spotify, which rarely gained a profit until 2023, returned around 2024 and had its first lucrative year. Now, Bloomberg reports that the company is thinking of uploading an additional $ 5.99 for a pro -premium subscription prices that reached $ 11.99 a month (which is from $ 9.99 it uploaded from 2011 to 2023), hoping to draw music superfans as a high quality audio, and accessories. In the not -so -distant future, Premium versions of Taylor Swift songs can only be available to those who can afford it. Spotify declined to confirm the discussed details of this story.

Rumors come as the music transmission game is changing; Spotify signed an agreement in January with the world’s largest music company, Universal bandTo advance what is seen as a new streaming 2.0 era in music, driven by more exclusive content and personalization. Amazon Music has also expanded its relations with UMG, announced unclear plans to develop exclusive content and raised reconciliation prices by $ 1 a month. Amazon did not respond to a comment request. But by replacing an award for almost all world music, levels will separate superfans from casual listeners – and some superfans can even agree on more than one musical transmitter if exclusive bids begin to further distinguish the spotify and Amazon catalogs.

After all, entertainment levels may not be such a bad deal for consumers. Mr. John Zhang, a marketing professor at the Wharton Business School of the University of Pennsylvania, says the tiered price in fact BEN Democratize these services. Various price levels allow people who want to pay less to do so and still have good content access, subsidized by those who are willing to pay for the premium. “What is good for level prices is that they give you the choice. It’s not like forcing you to be in the business class,” he says. “For people who pay the highest price, it’s voluntary, they want. Customers all get better; everyone has their choice.”

Right now, streamers are taking different access: some are loading more for additional content, and others have begun to get more of those who pay the least. All of this is likely to turn out that the price of the lower level is a worse experience in the entire table. On the planes, I will take the smallest place and remove water if it is not free. I will watch ads with Netflix and my hulu if it means I can justify reconciliation for both. If you want me to pay more every month, Spotify will have to come up with something particularly exclusive and attractive, like a jump on concert tickets, to defeat bots that ticketmaster wound. But if the best content goes after the fastest paywall, it will be a test to see how long the free subscribers can hold.


Amanda Hoover It is a high correspondent in Business Insider that covers the technology industry. She writes about companies and the largest tendencies of technology.

Business Insider discourse stories offer views on the most pressing issues of the day, informed by analysis, reporting and expertise.

Scroll to Top